In today's complex regulatory landscape, businesses face an increasingly challenging task of navigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission regulations across global, regional, and national levels. With estimates suggesting between 300 to 600 different rules and regulations just within the G20 states, companies need a strategic approach to manage compliance effectively without building massive dedicated teams.

The Global Foundation: The GHG Protocol

The GHG Protocol serves as the fundamental global framework for carbon accounting and reporting. Its comprehensive approach means that companies compliant with its Scopes 1, 2, and 3 reporting requirements already meet many of the more specific regulations at regional and local levels.

Understanding the Scope Framework

The Protocol can be visualized as a Russian nesting doll system of emissions, with each scope adding another layer of responsibility. At its core, Scope 1 encompasses direct emissions from company-owned or controlled sources. This includes company vehicles, heating systems, manufacturing processes, and chemical reactions. Measurement primarily involves tracking fuel consumption through purchase records and utility bills.

Scope 2 focuses on purchased electricity and requires dual reporting using both location-based and market-based methods. The location-based approach reflects average grid emissions intensity, while the market-based method accounts for emissions from purposefully chosen electricity contracts. This dual reporting provides a comprehensive view of a company's electricity-related emissions.

Scope 3 represents the broadest category, covering indirect emissions across 15 categories of upstream and downstream activities. Companies can focus on material categories based on thorough assessment, and the protocol allows for gradual improvement in data quality, starting with industry averages and progressing to more specific measurements over time.

European Union: Building on the Global Framework

The EU's approach, particularly through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, builds upon the GHG Protocol while adding specific requirements. These include detailed reporting timelines, third-party verification processes, comprehensive impact assessments, and transition planning requirements. This framework serves as a model for many national implementations while maintaining consistency with global standards.

National Implementations: Germany and France

Germany's Ambitious Approach

Germany has positioned itself as a climate protection frontrunner, weaving climate protection into both environmental and supply chain legislation through three main pillars. The Climate Change Act (Bundesklimaschutzgesetz) sets the framework for achieving climate neutrality by 2045 and establishes sector-specific reduction targets. Under this act, companies must set science-based reduction targets, report emissions annually, develop climate action plans, and obtain independent verification of their data.

The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz - LkSG), which applies to companies with 1,000+ employees since January 2024, requires comprehensive risk analysis of the entire supply chain. Companies must establish risk management systems that include climate impacts, with significant penalties of up to 2% of global annual turnover for large companies that fail to comply.

The CSR Directive Implementation Act brings the EU's CSRD into German law with additional requirements. Companies must provide detailed reporting on environmental matters and climate-related risks, with all reports requiring independent auditor verification.

France's Pioneer Approach

France established itself as an early adopter of climate reporting requirements through several key pieces of legislation. The Climate and Resilience Law mandates carbon footprint disclosure, climate change adaptation strategies, environmental product labeling, and sector-specific emission reduction targets. This comprehensive approach ensures companies address climate impacts across their operations.

The Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law (Devoir de Vigilance) goes further by requiring assessment and prevention of environmental impacts across value chains. Companies must map their supply chain climate impacts comprehensively, with legal liability for non-compliance. This approach has set a precedent for other nations considering similar legislation.

The PACTE Law introduces the innovative concept of "raison d'être" (corporate purpose), allowing companies to embed climate commitments in their bylaws, making environmental commitments legally binding. France's implementation of the CSRD extends beyond EU requirements, adding specific biodiversity impact reporting and detailed local impact assessments.

Recent Changes and Future Developments

The regulatory landscape continues to evolve rapidly in both countries. Germany has expanded its Supply Chain Due Diligence Act coverage, enhanced Climate Change Act requirements, implemented the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and introduced new corporate sustainability due diligence requirements. These changes reflect Germany's commitment to maintaining its position as a climate protection leader.

France has similarly implemented several new measures, including enhanced Climate and Resilience Law implementation, updated Duty of Vigilance requirements, new financial climate reporting requirements, and digital sustainability reporting standards. These changes demonstrate France's continued innovation in climate regulation.

Creating a Unified Compliance Approach

While perfect consolidation of all requirements isn't possible, companies can significantly reduce duplicate work through strategic planning. The key is building around the most comprehensive framework - currently the EU CSRD - which covers approximately 80-90% of all requirements.

A successful implementation strategy begins with the GHG Protocol as the foundation layer, establishing basic emissions accounting and core reporting structures. Companies should then build up to EU CSRD compliance, adding detailed reporting requirements, forward-looking assessments, and verification processes. Finally, national-specific requirements can be integrated, including country-specific elements and local formatting and language requirements.

Implementation should begin with a thorough assessment of applicable requirements and identification of the most comprehensive framework. Companies must then develop robust data collection systems that meet the highest standards, implement automated reporting tools, and establish strong verification processes. Ongoing management requires clear audit trails, regular system updates, and continuous monitoring of regulatory changes.

Looking Ahead

The next 12-18 months will bring significant changes to both German and French regulatory requirements. German companies should prepare for enhanced CBAM compliance systems by Q3 2024, new digital reporting requirements in 2025, expanded supply chain monitoring, and new emissions data verification requirements. French companies face similar challenges with digital sustainability reporting implementation, new biodiversity impact assessments in 2025, and enhanced climate transition planning requirements.

Success in this complex regulatory environment requires a strategic approach that builds comprehensive systems rather than treating each framework separately. Companies must focus on data quality and verification while maintaining flexibility for future changes. This includes appropriate resource planning for compliance tools and systems, staff training, and external expertise when needed.

Implementation of robust documentation processes and digital systems is crucial, with scalability being a key consideration for future requirements. While the regulatory landscape for GHG emissions continues to evolve and become more complex, companies can manage compliance effectively through strategic planning and implementation. The key is building strong foundational systems based on the most comprehensive requirements while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to new regulations as they emerge.

The path to successful GHG emissions compliance may seem daunting, but with a structured approach and clear understanding of the regulatory hierarchy, companies can navigate these requirements efficiently and effectively. The investment in proper systems and processes today will pay dividends as regulatory requirements continue to evolve and expand in the future.
 

PS: Did you enjoy this blog post? Sign-up for the “Close the Gap” blog and “The Supply Chain Dialogues” podcast on the helmigadvisory.com webpage, or listen in on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or any other large platform).  

Are you interested in having a dialogue about the above, receiving Advisory support on tackling the topic best in your firm, or just having an exploratory call with Daniel? Contact us via e-mail or call +41432000015.

© helmig advisory AG, 2024 - All rights reserved.